Bankruptcy
Fraud
Family on Family Crime

As
Donna Sturman waits for the New York U.S. Trustee to provide justice,
a bankruptcy trustee has kept her brothers' bankruptcy case open
since 1989, billing it $5 million and is seeking another $2 million.
Donna
says her brothers stole her inheritance and now the bankruptcy trustee
is stealing it under the guise of administering the case.

Sturman's
Evidence
The following is Bankruptcy fraud in Southern District Of New York.
It has rendered me homeless, penniless, and bankrupt for exposing
a fraud.
Submitted
by Donna Sturman
Pending
litigation is as follows:
Donna Sturman v. Chase Manhattan Bank (Southern District
of New York Bankruptcy Court) Adversary Proceeding No. 98-9435A)
Donna
Sturman v. Marc Stuart Goldberg Trustee for the Estates of Howard,
Bruce Wayne Sturman.
(Southern
District of New York Bankruptcy Court Adversary Proceeding No.
99/8076A)
MARC STUART GOLDBERG, BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATES OF WAYNE STURMAN,
BRUCE STURMAN AND HOWARD P. STURMAN vs JOSEPH WARREN, AS EXECUTOR OF
THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF MURIEL STURMAN, DECEASED, AND DONNA
A. STURMAN,
Bankruptcy Case: Adv. Pro. No. 98-9332A
1. The
litigation against the Trustee and Chase was filed by the law firms
of Stewart Occhipinti & Makow, LLP. Charles A. Stewart, III Esq.
and Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Helen Davis Chaitman,
Esq. Philip Guarino Esq. on my behalf.
When
a previous law firm (Pollack & Greene) got judgment
against me for fees they filed an Involuntary Bankruptcy proceeding
against me in April 2002
Even
though, I nor any of my counsel received notice, Judge Beatty (S.D.N.Y.B.C.) entered
orders for relief against me approximately 25 days later.
Chaitman
had promised me that she and Phil Guarino would prepare a motion
to remove the reference from Judge beatty since January 2002.
On
May 30, 2002, they informed me that they were now my creditors, would
not file motion to remove reference, (they did fax me the motion) and
that they could no longer represent me.
They
also refused to contest the Involuntary. I had no idea at the time
they were leaving the firm. Eleanor Healy, was Chaitman's secretary
and is very knowledgeable about my situation.
2. My
brothers Howard Sturman, Bruce Sturman Wayne Sturman and the accountant,
Jerry Schwartz, were all convicted. case is:
United
States District Court Southern District of New York
USA v Schwartz, Howard Sturman Bruce Sturman Wayne Sturman
Hon. Barbara S. Jones
96-CR 318 CR-96-657 (ADS)
3. I
have a malpractice lawsuit pending entitled:
Donna
Sturman AKA Donna Sturman Butler v. Milbank, Tweed Hadley McCloy
New York State Supreme Court
Index No. 106948/94
Some
of the lawyers that represented me there were the same attorneys
that were involved in the Bucyrus Erie Bankruptcy conflict of interest
case. They are John Gellene, Toni Lichstein, Steven Blauner. Attorneys
that worked on my cases and that are no longer at the firm are Flora
Schnall, Melanie Cykanowski, Deborah Hochman, Nicolas Tanelli, David
Gelfand.
4. A
brief chronology is as follows:
I
hired Milbank in 1986 because my brothers were using properties and
my parents' estates for their own personal use.
My
father died suddenly in July 1973 , My mother died in April 1980
-- both estates have never been closed. My brothers gave me $3,000
a month from a partnership and excluded me from the all information
about businesses.
In
June, after learning that my brothers were in the process of selling
properties without my knowledge or consent, Milbank filed a summons
and complaint on my behalf against my three brothers.
During
discovery, Milbank learned of loans being made to H. Development
Corp. from Manufacturers Hanover Trust (became chemical Bank
in 1992 , then Chase Manhattan Bank, and now JP Morgan Chase).
These loans were made to the corporation for my brothers own personal
use and to fund margin calls.
When
Judge ordered Bank to comply with more discovery prior to September
1989, Manufacturers filed an Involuntary bankruptcy against my brothers.
I was not informed that Milbank represented Manufacturers in other
matters until November 11, 1989. At that time Milbank partner, Toni
Lichtstein, wrote to me that I "should only seek advice
from other counsel for, any possible claims I might have against
the Bank."
The
involuntary has stayed all my litigation and discovery since August
4, 1989. Milbank continued to represent me until October 1993.
My
brothers attorneys were Stroock, Stroock & Lavan. They were also
attorneys that were assisting my brothers in their hostile takeover
of Cooper Companies in 1988. Stroock also filed 13D SEC reports for
my brothers stating there was no litigation pending against my brothers
in 1989.
Cases
were assigned to Southern District of New York Judge Prudence Abrams,
now know as Judge Prudence Carter Beatty. Judge Beatty was formerly
a partner at Stroock, Stroock & Lavan.
Orders
for relief were not entered until April 1991 , giving my brothers
almost two years to work out settlement and hide assets.
Judge
Beatty appointed Marc Stuart Goldberg as my brothers trustee. Marc
Goldberg used Manufacturers Hanover Trust company as his reference
in 1989 Martindale Hubbell attorney listings. In April 1991 she also
allowed my brothers trustee to takeover all non-bankrupt corporate
and partnership properties and proceeds.
The
order on the docket states "unsigned order regarding ownership/partnership
issues." Milbank partner Steven Blauner never objected,
even though I repeatedly asked how a trustee for my brothers could
takeover non-bankrupt properties. In 1991 I had a tax lien levied
against me for 'phantom' income.
In
November, two days before the trustee and accountants were to review
books and records, the office that was the headquarters for all the
Sturman enterprises, was destroyed by arson. The trustee did not
maintain insurance on the property and all records were destroyed.
The
law firm of Pollack & Greene agreed to take my cases on contingency
in July 1993. Pollack & Greene never put in filed any objections
on my behalf against trustee. Facing a third eviction Pollack & Greene
arranged for me to enter into an agreement with two real estate developers
for a $30,000 loan and all my interest in the properties attached
to my proof of claim. Pollack & Greene appointed themselves as
counsel to this new partnership. Pollack & Greene filed malpractice
claim on my behalf in April 1994.
During
discovery, I saw internal documents from Milbank that confirmed to
me the fact that my brothers' trustee had no right to takeover the
properties. Trustee and his law firms have received fees totaling
over $5 million and are claiming they are owed approximately $2 million
more.
I
also found out that Pollack & Greene had been getting paid by
these developers behind my back. I informed Pollack & Greene
that they should rescind the agreement in June of 1995. They refused
and told bankruptcy court that they had a conflict and could no longer
represent me. I was forced to appear pro se until 1997.
Pollack & Greene
sued me for fees and took me to arbitration at the same time I was
appearing in bankruptcy court per se. Without me being present at
some hearings or putting in evidence, the arbitrator decided for
Pollack & Greene and they got a judgment against me in 1998.
Pollack & Greene
filed an Involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against me On April 14,
2002. Judge Beatty entered orders for relief in my Involuntary Bankruptcy
she attached it to my brother Wayne's' case so it would not be heard
by another Judge.
Milbank
filed on my behalf the following complaints starting in 1987 and
the following removed by Milbank to Southern District New York Bankruptcy
Court Judge Prudence Beatty (formerly Abrams) these cases
have never been decided and are attached as exhibits A- N to my Proof
of claim $20 million in each brothers cases.
Exhibit
A -- list of 28 Properties
Exhibit
B
(1)
Yorkville Associates, a New York general partnership
(2) Pelham Associates, a New York general partnership
(3) Pelham Racquetball & Health Club, d/b/a Metrofit Athletic
Club of Pelham, a New York general partnership
(4) Wayne Adam Corporation
(5) H Development Corporation
(6) 6-8 Pelham Parkway Corporation
(7) H. P. Howard & company
(8) Cauldwell Management Corporation
(9) Anthony J. Griffen Corporation
(10) Cornwall Estates, Inc.
(11) A. B. Yale Corporation
(12) Astoria Terminal Inc.
(13) Sea Bridge and Pier Terminal Corp
Exhibit
C June 26, 1987 Donna Sturman Butler v. Howard Sturman,
Bruce Sturman and Wayne Sturman (Supreme Court, New York County,
Index No. 15379/87) IAS Part 3 (Davis, J.)
July
9, 10, 1987 Amended Complaint Donna Sturman Butler v. Howard Sturman,
individually and as Executor of the Estate of Muriel Sturman, et
al. Bruce Sturman,Wayne Sturman, Joseph Warren, as Executor of the
Estate of Muriel Sturman, 6-8 Pelham Parkway Corp., Anthony J. Griffen
Corp., HP Howard & Co., H Development Co., Wayne Adam Corp.,
and Cornwall Estates Inc. (Supreme Court State of New York, County
of New York Index No. 15379/87) with attached Notice of Removal to
S.D.N.Y.B.C. dated June 28, 1991 and Verified Application for Removal
dated June 28, 1991
Exhibit
D petition for a compulsory account dated January 6, 1988,
with attached exhibits, in Proceeding for Compulsory Account in
the Estate of Muriel Sturman, Deceased, State of New York, County
Of New York, Surrogates Court, File No. 2400/80
Exhibit
E Order to Show cause dated July 27, 1990, with attached
proposed order and affidavit in support of Respondent Donna Sturman
Butler's Motion to Enjoin Distributions without Court order dated
July 27, 1990 (with attached exhibits thereto), in The Matter of
the Judicial Settlement of the account of Howard Sturman, Executor
of the Estate of Muriel Sturman, Deceased, State of New York, County
of New York, Surrogate's Court, File No. 2400/80
Exhibit
F Amended Third-party complaint by Donna Sturman Butler
dated June 29, 1990, in Cornerstone Leisure Industries, Inc. and
Cornerstone Metrofit Corporation v. Howard P. Sturman et al., United
States District Court for the District of Utah, Northern Division,
Civil No. 89-NC 0077J (Jenkins, J.)
Exhibit
G Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Cross-Claim by Donna
Sturman Butler dated June 28, 1990 in Cornerstone Leisure Industries,
Inc. and cornerstone Metrofit Corporation v. Howard P. Sturman
et al., United States District Court for the District Of Utah,
Northern Division, Civil No. 89-NC 0077J (Jenkins,J.)
Exhibit
H Verified complaint dated June 12, 1991, with attached
Exhibits, in Donna Sturman Butler, individually and derivatively
on Behalf of Wayne-Adam Corp., v. Svirsky et al., Supreme Court
of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No., 3076/91
Exhibit
I Complaint dated July 16, 1990, with attached exhibits,
in Donna Sturman Butler v. Cowan,Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.,
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index
No. 9560/90
Exhibit
J Complaint dated September 10, 1990, with attached exhibits,
in Donna Sturman Butler v. Overseas Funding Corporation et al.,
Supreme Court of the state of New York, County of Westchester,
Index No. 91-15613
Exhibit
K Complaint dated July 16, 1990, with attached exhibits,
in Donna Sturman Butler v. Cowan and Whitney, Supreme Court State
of New York, County of Westchester, Index No. 91-15611
Exhibit
L Complaint dated July 16, 1990, with attached exhibits,
in Yorkville Associates v. Overseas Funding Corporation et al.,
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester,
Index No. 91-15614
Exhibit
M Complaint dated September 10, 1990, with attached exhibits,
in Pelham Associates v. Overseas Funding Corporation and M and
H Construction Corp., Supreme Court of the State of New York, County
of Westchester, Index No. 91-15612
Exhibit
N Complaint dated July 16, 1990 , with attached exhibits,
in Pelham Racquetball and Health Club d/b/a Metrofit Athletic Club
of Pelham v. Cowan et al., Supreme Court State of New York, County
of New York, Index No. 12918/90
Damages
were to be determined after discovery and trial. Constructive trusts
were to be imposed to me upon
(i) all
monies received or possessed by defendants that are due the partnership
and/or Butler
(ii) all
profits realized from defendants' use of the monies due the partnerships
and/or Butler, and
(iii) any
other value possessed by defendants that is rightfully and equitably
belonging to the Partnerships and/or Butler.
The
court was also to grant such other and further relief as this court
may deem just and proper, together with interest and costs and disbursements
of this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The trustee
has sold or abandoned all properties without investigating my interests
in those properties or monies owed to me. He also sold large amounts
of Cooper Companies stock.
In
1994 Chemical bank, successor to Manufacturers filed Adversary against
the Trustee , Marc Goldberg for unjust enrichment of $18 million
dollars from the sale of the stock. They settled and the terms of
the settlement not in court records. When I questioned why I was
not noticed about the sale of the stock the Judge told me to be quiet.
When
I tried to remind her that I was to be noticed on all matters, she
had me removed in handcuffs by marshals. I was held in handcuffs
for several hours until a friend of mine called attorney Ronald Kuby.
When he called the judge she left the bench during the hearing to
tell marshals to let me go.
I
was later informed by her law clerk that she was afraid that Ron
Kuby would show up to court with reporters.
Helen
and Charles filed adversaries on my behalf in 1998 against Chase
Manhattan Bank and the trustee Marc Goldberg. Judge Beatty has not
made any decisions or allowed discovery since 1998.
In
April 2001, I agreed to a settlement with the trustee to settle for
$3.8 million. Hearings were held in June/July 2001 with the trustee
testifying to how I was entitled to constructive trust interest to
all the proceeds. He further stated that he believed settlement would
benefit other creditors as he believed I could prove I was the only
bona fide creditor.
Judge
Beatty denied the settlement at a hearing held on December 7, 2001,
stating "I had already received too much."
The
transcript from this hearing also contains numerous biased remarks
against me. My counsel requested that a distribution be made to me.
He informed her that I was once again facing homelessness.
She
told him that "could not make a distribution to me because
of the Pollack & Greene judgment and that it was Christmas time
maybe he should parade me and my three children and play the violin,
and ask them to allow me to have some money."
We
have been homeless since January 2002 living with friends and now
in a hotel for the homeless.
Since
1991 , my children and I have been evicted from six apartments, I
have no credit and have been labeled as litigious.
I
had no experience with litigation prior to the hiring of Milbank
in 1986 and initially was told by them they could reach a settlement
with my brothers and there would be no need for litigation. I also
have had three children since then and having been raising them alone
since April 1993.
***
Copyright
2007 by WJFA. All rights reserved. This material on this web site
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. See
WJFA's Disclaimer and Privacy
Policy. Contact the webmaster to
report problems with the web site.
|