 |
 |
FRAUD:
WHERE IT HAPPENS
|
 |
|
States
with the most serious
mortgage fraud problems:
|
|
|
| |
|
Fraud
index1
|
|
1
|
Florida |
224
|
|
|
|
2
|
Utah |
209
|
|
|
|
3
|
Georgia |
193
|
|
|
|
4
|
Colorado |
175
|
|
|
|
5
|
Illinois |
163
|
|
|
|
6
|
Missouri |
135
|
|
|
|
7
|
Texas |
126
|
|
|
|
8
|
California |
122
|
|
|
|
9
|
Michigan |
117
|
|
|
|
10
|
Ohio |
112
|
|
|
| 1-100=average |
| Where
mortgage fraud occurred
most often in 2005: |
 |
| Applications |
59%
|
 |
| Tax,
financial statements |
22%
|
 |
| Verification
of deposits |
16%
|
 |
| Appraisals,
valuations |
14%
|
 |
| Verification
of employment |
13%
|
 |
| Escrow,
closing |
7%
|
 |
| Credit
reports |
4%
|
 |
Doesn't
add to 100% because
most incidents involved
more than one type
of fraud
Source: Mortgage
Asset Research Institute
|
|
|
 |
|
Those
hurt by fraud are not only lenders, but also the
thousands of other homeowners who pay higher interest
rates as a result, and the neighborhoods where
foreclosures depress property values, invite crime
and drain city resources.
Florida
is the No. 1 hot spot for mortgage fraud, followed
by Utah, Georgia, Colorado, Illinois and issouri (see
chart at left).
Fraud
cases are likely to continue increase this year
and next, the Mortgage Asset Research Institute
reports.
That's
because fraud has become harder to hide in today's
slower housing market, when lenders have more time
to review applications and appraisals. And because
fraudulent loans tend to fall into foreclosure
after about three years, many bad loans from the
real estate boom have yet to surface.
About
30 miles from where Barber used to live, he sits
in a transfer detention center circled by fences
topped with razor wire, waiting to be moved out
of state.
Barber,
42, who did not testify at his trial, spent more
than two hours explaining to a reporter how to
find victims, steal from homeowners and lenders,
and hide the crimes. Then he offered advice on
how to avoid being scammed.
"If
I wanted to be a stinker, I could tear up any
state I walked in," he boasted. "From
right here in jail, I could do every one of the
things I talked about" with USA TODAY.
You'd
better believe him, said Linda Marshall, the assistant
U.S. attorney who prosecuted Barber.
"Unfortunately,
I think that's very realistic, because so much
can be done by computer, telephone and fax — things
he has access to in prison. If he didn't, with
the help from someone on the outside, he could
accomplish it."
Barber's
crimes spotlight flaws in the mortgage lending
and regulatory systems and show how easy it is
to exploit the greed and trust in human nature.
The
FBI had Barber on its radar screen for months,
but the case was inactive. To investigators, Barber
looked small-time because he used "straw" buyers
to hide his deals, Marshall explained. "He
got caught after an angry ex-business associate
walked into an FBI office one day and started singing."
Barber
and nine accomplices have been convicted or pleaded
guilty, and a few others will soon be indicted,
Marshall said. After Barber was convicted by a
jury, he pleaded guilty to 104 other counts of
money laundering, conspiracy and the interstate
transfer of funds obtained by fraud. He was ordered
to pay $11 million in restitution.
One
of his most effective scams, documents show, looked
like this:
Say
a real estate investor came to you and told you
banks wouldn't let him buy any more property because
his credit was maxed out. But if he could buy a
property in your name, he'd give you $1,500 to
$2,500 for the trouble of signing the documents.
He'd
pay all the costs and either find a tenant to cover
the mortgage or pay it himself. Then, after a year,
he'd sell the property and share the profits with
you. Sound good? If you said yes, you'd be what
criminals and the FBI call a straw buyer.
Not
all of them lost money. Barber paid some straws
after he flipped the properties, documents show.
But in the end, many of Barber's straws were stuck
with empty, decaying properties and mortgages they
couldn't afford.
Lenders
suffered losses on 205 of the 283 properties in
the case, according to court documents. Marshall
said most of the straws lost their properties to
foreclosure or signed them over to the lenders
to avoid foreclosure, and several filed for bankruptcy
protection.
Elderly
people make attractive prey, Barber said. They
tend to have low bills, high credit scores and
all the documentation banks need.
"You
say: 'Look you're not really going to owe money.
It's going to be my house, or the tenants are going
to be making payments. … The rent is $500,
and the payment is $300. By signing here, you're
going to get the difference," he explained.
One
of Barber's straws, Elvin Barton, told the judge, "I'm
70 years old, and because of him I have to start
over. … Mr. Barber gained my trust through
manipulation and used my good name and credit to
add to his wealth. Mr. Barber never intended to
live up to his promises, leaving me with six foreclosed
homes. I could not make the payments."
Barber's
advice: Verify everything.
"You
don't just verify the first thing and then believe
(someone with a real estate deal) thereafter."
If
people offer a real estate deal, Barber said, verify
where they've lived for the past 10 years. Ask
for and speak to their banking references. Check
credit scores. Ask to see their tax returns. See
if lawsuits have been filed against them.
Stealing
your house
After
police arrested Barber in August 2004, several
witnesses told them Barber had blank real estate
deeds in the back of his gold Infiniti Q45 luxury
car, Marshall said. Deed fraud is almost impossible
to detect before the damage is done.
"The
whole system of (real estate) recording is set
up assuming the society is sheep and there are
no wolves," Barber says.
He
sketches a series of scenarios in which he could
steal your home and borrow money against it, and
you wouldn't know until his lender tried to foreclose
on your house.
Barber
could, for example, find an older neighborhood
where most residents are retired and their homes
paid off. He could forge a homeowner's signature,
he says, and deed the house to himself. He could
buy a notary's stamp for about $35 at an office
supply store, and file the fake deed at the county
recorder's office for $21.
Then,
with the title to the property in his name, Barber
could take out a mortgage against it. "If you
could buy one house that way," he says, "you
could buy 20 a day."
In
fact, no county recorder's office will verify the
information on real estate documents, says Mark
Monacelli, president of the Property Records Industry
Association. The recorder's job is to ensure that
documents are filled out properly, signed and notarized.
"The
system has always been vulnerable," says
Monacelli, who agrees that if anyone wanted to
commit such fraud, it's not hard.
Recently,
Monacelli's organization formed a group to find
ways to help county recorders combat fraud. Los
Angeles and Philadelphia now alert property owners
by mail when key documents are filed against their
property.
Barber's
advice: Title companies should have
to call lenders to verify paid-off loans. Counties
should require that deeds be filed by the buyer,
in person, with I.D.
Foreclosure
fraud
After
his arrest, Barber was free on bail until May 2005,
when prosecutors found out he and another partner
had defrauded a man facing foreclosure on his home.
So the judge jailed Barber until the trial.
Nationwide,
foreclosures are inching up as people with shaky
credit fall behind on payments. Nearly 5 percent
of borrowers are behind on mortgages, and the figure
is projected to climb as people with adjustable-rate
loans see their payments exceed what they can afford.
This
could be the next wave of fraud, Barber says. He
says he could approach a homeowner who's falling
behind on a mortgage and offer to assume the loan
and rent out the house to cover the payments. Barber
says he'd leave the loan in the name of the homeowner,
who'd still be responsible for it. He could pocket
the rent and hide past-due notices from the homeowner.
"It
would take three months before the lender is
even going to start foreclosing, and even when
they start foreclosing, I can hold off that foreclosure
for six months to a year. … So if I had
one house and the rent is $600 a month, I'd have
$7,200 on that house (in a year), and if I got
10 houses, I'd make $72,000," he said.
Marshall
says Barber did something similar: He stopped making
payments on his straw buyers' homes but still collected
rent.
Barber's
advice: Verify that documents are filed.
If you're behind on your mortgage, try to rent
out your house and move to a cheaper apartment.
If you're behind $3,000 in payments, ask the
tenants for a deposit of that amount. Put a no-sublease
clause in the contract. And verify the tenant's
rental history. Sign up for a credit-score alert
program that will notify you if there's a change
in your credit file, like an overdue payment.
Stated-income
loans
Barber
is sitting on a plastic chair in a 5-x-5-foot Meeting
Cell with the real estate section of the local
paper. He reads aloud the ads he thinks have potential
for fraudulent mortgage applications, such as: "Real
estate loans. Residential, commercial, cash-out,
refis, all credit types accepted. 100% non-owner
occupied investment loans."
Barber
blames lenders for approving loans with little
or no proof of a borrower's finances, for making
fraud easy to commit. These so-called "stated
loans" are also known in the industry as "liar
loans." They were designed to help people
who were self-employed or working on commissions,
with incomes that vary from year to year.
But
in high-cost areas such as California, where homeowners
often must stretch beyond traditional lending ratios
to afford a home, some 75 percent of buyers have
turned to loans that require low, or, no proof
of income/assets, which is an increase from the
34 percent in 2000, according to First American
Loan Performance.
The
mortgage industry knows that loans with little
or no documentation speed the approval process, "But
they are open invitations to fraudsters," according
to a report by the Mortgage Asset Research Institute.
"When
these loans were introduced, they made sense,
given the relatively strict requirements borrowers
had to meet before qualifying," the-April-2006-report
states. "Competitive pressures, however,
have caused many lenders to loosen these requirements
to a point that makes many risk managers squirm."
Barber
is blunter: "The word 'stated' should be synonymous
in the world with 'fraud.' "
Corey
Carlisle, a senior director for the Mortgage Bankers
Association, concedes there has been a rise in
fraudulent stated-income loans but contends that
stated-income loans are "a tried-and-true loan
documentation type for lenders."
Barber's
advice: Ban stated loans.
"Everything
(on a loan application) should be fully documented."
After
two hours, Barber is still imagining new scams.
His mind seems trained to see and exploit weaknesses
in the real estate system. He suggests safeguards
to stop fraud; then he thinks of ways around them.
With
good behavior, Barber could be out of prison in
nine years. Although he admitted his guilt in court,
in his interview with USA TODAY he offered no regrets
about the people he hurt.
"I
guess I had drive to want to earn a little money," he
says. He pauses and sighs. "I think my priorities
were out of alignment."