|
In
Pro Per
|
|
Jack
Daniels, In Pro Per
Superior
Court of California
Unclean Hands Doctrine
'Under the 'unclean hands' doctrine, a party is barred from relief if he has engaged in any unconscientious conduct directly related to the transaction or matter before the court." (DeRosa v. Transamerica Title Insurance Co. (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1390, 1395, 262 Cal.Rptr. 370.) Blah, blah, blah, and so on and so... |
Here, as demonstrated above, plaintiff engaged in abusive and unconscientious conduct directly related to the lawsuit, the judgment in which this lawsuit seeks to set aside.
This includes attempting to deprive defendant of his right to petition the government through use of litigation to harass him, falsification/concealment of crucial evidence, [FN20] improper attempts to depose Main Action jurors and court personnel, efforts to deprive defendant of counsel, key witnesses and evidence, and subjecting him to the "Fair Game" policy.
Therefore, equitable relief should be denied because of plaintiff's unclean hands. If you come into court seeking the benefit of equity, you cannot have engaged in misconduct in the cause from which you are seeking relief in equity).
Examples are express or implied legal relationships (you have a fiduciary obligation to someone, you have a legal duty to represent their interests), and familial relationships. Parents have a fiduciary obligation to their children, spouses have a fiduciary obligation.
Sharing Strategies
Got a strategy that worked for you and you want to share with other victims of fraud? Submit your suggestions to In Pro Per. Put in the subject box the words: Self Help submission.