
Violent
Crimes
A Question of Murder

In
the rainy predawn darkness of April 4, 1985, Delbert Ray Edmonds tumbled
awkwardly to the ground near his camper and slowly bled to death from
a gunshot wound to his stomach.
A
grand jury indicted William Westbay for the murder of Edmonds. A trial
date was set, and then ------- nothing. That is where it stopped and has
been in limbo since 1988.
The
thought of Delbert watching his life wash away in the rain haunts his
siblings and children, who say they have been distraught at the delayed
justice.

A
Huge Crack in the Justice System
As Delbert's
family waits for the Bullitt County Commonwealth Attorneys (equivalent
to district attorneys) to do the right thing, we are putting the question
to you: Are the crimes against Delbert prosecutable?
The evidence
will demonstrate that from 1985 to current, Bullitt County prosecutors
have allowed this travesty of justice to go one knowing the family is
forced to walk the streets with Westbay.
The prosecutors
now say "Insufficient Evidence" to prosecute Westbay. Yet,
a grand jury and coroner disagree.
If, after
reviewing Delbert's story, and you believe that justice should be pursued,
we hope you will help influence the Bullitt County Commonwealth to serve
justice and give this family closure and peace.
By
Jason Riley and R.G. Dunlop
The Courier-Journal
Posted 7/12/03
It
rained intensely all night on April 14, 1985, in the rural Kentucky county
of Bullitt. The 33-year-old Delbert Edmonds and his friends stayed inside
the camper trailer having drinks and playing cards.
By
pre-dawn Edmonds was dead -- struck at pointblank range by a blast from
a .410 gauge shotgun that riddled his liver, pancreas, and kidneys.
It's
been 17 years since his death and his family is still begging the commonwealth
attorneys to prosecute the indicted suspect, William H. Westbay, now 49,
an itinerant scrap metal collector.
Westbay,
who was indicted by the grand jury, counters that Edmonds committed suicide
and that is why the commonwealth attorney has not prosecuted him.
The Victim:
Delbert Ray Edmonds
Friends
and family say Edmonds, was a good man and well liked by family, friends,
and people in the community. He was a divorced father of four, who had
purchased that day, Easter presents for his children, but they would be
delivered by someone else.
According
to Bullitt Commonwealth's Attorney Mike Mann, toxicology tests showed
that Edmonds was legally drunk when he died, struck at point-blank range
by a blast from a .410-gauge shotgun that riddled his liver, pancreas
and kidneys.
Two
officials involved in the case and who likely would have been called as
witnesses had William H. Westbay's case ever gone to trial strongly disagree
on the likelihood of Edmonds' death being a suicide.
Edmonds'
case remains open and Westbay, has yet to stand trial. Equally, charges
have not been dropped, either.

The Accused: William
H. Westbay
Westbay,
now 49, has been free on bond since shortly after the shooting in 1985,
and says Edmonds killed himself. Westbay saw his case removed from the
trial docket in Bullitt Circuit Court in 1988, by prosecutors who didn't
think they had enough evidence to convict him.
Yet,
they have never dismissed the charges, or, officially declared Edmonds'
death a suicide. The case is just in limbo. Westbay still has a charge
of murder against him, but the prosecutors have not pursued a trial.
"They
(the state) have no evidence," Westbay said. "They ain't worried
about it, I ain't worried about it."
Two
Families Torn
Because
the case has never been resolved, Westbay and Edmonds' family say they
are in living nightmares.
Prosecutors
say they were reluctant to dismiss the case, partly to avoid angering
or upsetting Edmonds' family but also in the faint hope that additional
evidence might surface.
As
a result, Westbay and Edmonds' family have been left dangling in a legal
limbo with bitter feelings toward each other.
No
jury has ever heard the contradictory evidence in the case, including
the testimony of two officials who have starkly differing views on whether
Edmonds' death was murder or a suicide.
Bullitt
Commonwealth's Attorney Mike Mann, who has allowed the case to languish
for the past decade, reviewed with the newspaper some of the testimony
heard by the grand jury that indicted Westbay.
Mann
agreed that some unresolved issues and apparent inconsistencies did surface
in the testimony, but disputed the notion that unanswered questions and
conflicting accounts of what occurred warranted taking the case to trial
and letting jurors decide Westbay's guilt or innocence.
The
case should have been dismissed years ago, Mann said, adding that he now
intends to ask Bullitt Circuit Judge Thomas Waller to drop the murder
charge.
"If
you don't have enough evidence, you shouldn't be prosecuting a case,"
said Mann, who became commonwealth's attorney in December 1992 and who
also served as an assistant for 2-1/2 years in the late 1980s to then-Commonwealth's
Attorney Waller, who is now the circuit judge.
Mann
acknowledged that he never sought to dismiss the indictment even though
no new evidence has surfaced and the investigation is not active, because
Edmonds' family wanted it prosecuted -- or at least kept open.
"That's
probably something I shouldn't have agreed to," Mann said.
Asked
if it was fair to Westbay to have a murder charge hanging over his head
for more than 17 years if prosecutors thought from the beginning that
the chances of obtaining a conviction were remote, Mann replied: "Probably
not."
Westbay's
murder case is one of more than 200 Bullitt County criminal cases mired
in inactivity for periods ranging from three years to nearly two decades,
an investigation by The Courier-Journal found. The Edmonds case is among
the oldest pending cases in the huge backlog, and apparently the only
one involving a suspected homicide.
Judge
Waller agreed in an interview that he and others involved in Westbay's
prosecution have always doubted the strength of the evidence.
But
Waller was unable to explain why he, as commonwealth's attorney, didn't
do something to resolve the case -- try it, negotiate a plea agreement
or ask that the case be dismissed. A prosecutor can ask the court to dismiss
an indictment for a variety of reasons, including insufficient evidence
to convict the defendant.
"I
recall that case because I recommended (to the grand jury) against an
indictment," the judge said. "I don't remember the facts. I
just remember that I didn't think we had a case that we could take to
the jury."
Lack
of Closure
Without
a trial, questions unanswered
Westbay
was released from jail on $20,000 bond 11 days after the shooting. Although
Westbay has since pleaded guilty to a half-dozen traffic offenses, he
apparently has not been accused of any other violent crime. In a brief
interview, he said that while he would prefer to be rid of the murder
charge, it doesn't bother him.
"They
(the state) have no evidence. They ain't worried about it, I ain't worried
about it." But his family tells a different story. They say it has
been cruel to force him to live with the stigma of a murder rap when he
is innocent, they said.
The
lack of closure has left members of Edmonds' family feeling angry, frustrated,
and helpless.
Linda
Fox, one of Edmonds' six sisters, said she and her mother made repeated
trips to Waller's office in Shepherdsville whenever a hearing was scheduled
in the case during the 80s. But nothing of consequence ever happened,
Fox said. Usually, the hearings were postponed.
After
Westbay pleaded not guilty to the murder charge on July 15, 1985, his
case was set for trial eight times between Nov. 26 of that year and Dec.
15, 1988, court records show. Each time, it was continued.
"We
tried to push it," Fox said. "But they said there wasn't enough
evidence."
Dana
Fudge, Edmonds' oldest child, who was 10 years old when her father died,
said having no resolution to the case always bothered her. "I'm 28
years old now, and I still think about it and cry. I haven't stopped missing
him."
Because
Westbay was never tried, several unresolved issues still surround Edmonds'
death -- issues of the sort that a jury would have considered had prosecutors
chosen to aggressively pursue the case. Foremost among them: Who fired
the fatal shot?
According
to Mann, toxicology tests showed that Edmonds was legally drunk when he
died, and Westbay also had been drinking heavily with him in the trailer
that the two men shared.
The
shotgun was not tested for fingerprints because Westbay told investigators
that several people had handled it. Westbay was not tested for the presence
of gunshot residue because he said he had been out in the rain and had
washed his hands.
No
gunshot residue was found on Edmonds' body either. Mann speculated that
it could have been washed away in the rain.
Westbay
told investigators that Edmonds had been depressed over his inability
to find steady work, and that Edmonds woke him to say he had shot himself.
Westbay said he replied, "Sure you did," and went back to sleep.
Other
unresolved issues include the fact that neither Westbay nor anyone in
the area acknowledged hearing a gunshot -- a fact that at least one grand
juror found curious. Police were not called to the scene until several
hours after the shooting. A relative of Westbay's, who made the call,
said she was told Edmonds needed medical attention because he was choking.
Members
of Edmonds' family vehemently reject the notion that Edmonds committed
suicide, saying Edmonds had made peace with his ex wife, loved his children
and was looking forward to the approaching holiday.
"I
know my dad would definitely not shoot himself," Fudge said. "There
was no way he could leave his four kids. He was not despondent about anything
at the time"
She
and other family members also expressed doubt that Edmonds could have
committed suicide with a shotgun because he was a small man, just 5 feet
6 inches tall; they believe his arms were too short to have reached the
trigger with the gun barrel pointed at his stomach.
Two
officials involved in the case and who likely would have been called as
witnesses had Westbay's case ever gone to trial strongly disagree on the
likelihood of Edmonds' death being a suicide.
Former
Bullitt County Coroner Gayle Troutman said he is convinced that Edmonds
did not kill himself.
"I've
never seen anyone commit suicide and walk away from it," said Troutman,
who estimated that he investigated more than 300 deaths, including 50
or more homicides, before he retired in 1996 after 25 years as coroner.
"If I found him in that yard, and the gun was inside (a gun was found
in the trailer, leaning against a wall), there's no way he could have
walked out that far. A shotgun's gonna tear you up."
Troutman
also said that while he recalled cases in which people committed suicide
by putting the gun to their chest and pushing the trigger with a toe,
doing so invariably left telltale marks on the foot.
"I
don't recall that happening. I'm sure it didn't," Troutman said.
Question
of Suicide
Physician
disputes ex-coroner's comments
Informed
of Troutman's comments, Dr. Barbara Weakley-Jones, Kentucky's assistant
chief medical examiner, who performed the autopsy on Edmonds, said: "That's
the difference between a medical examiner-physician and a (lay) coroner."
Weakley-Jones
said that while she was unable to say conclusively whether Edmonds killed
himself or was murdered, her findings were consistent with a suicide.
Disputing
virtually every point Troutman made, Weakley-Jones said it is indeed possible
for the victim of a shotgun wound to walk around, and even talk.
"I've
seen them shot in the heart and walk 100 yards," Weakley-Jones said.
"It only got his liver, pancreas and kidneys. He could have survived
for at least a little while, 20 minutes perhaps. It is possible to hold
a shotgun yourself and shoot yourself in the abdomen. You can set the
stock of the gun on the ground and pull the trigger with your thumb."
Weakley-Jones
said other factors arguing for suicide included the fact that Edmonds
was shot at very close range, with the gun barrel an inch or less from
his stomach.
"That's
more consistent with suicide, because most people won't let you walk up
to them and blow them away," she said. "Contact wounds don't
always mean suicide, but it's more likely than in a homicide."
Also
noting the gun found in the trailer, Weakley-Jones said: "In a homicide,
the shooter generally takes the weapon."
In
the absence of a trial, such assertions and arguments are merely academic,
because they have not been subjected to cross-examination, considered
in the light of other expert testimony and weighed by a jury.
Meanwhile,
Westbay continues to live in the same neighborhood where the shooting
occurred, at the end of a gravel driveway just off Trappers Road. Access
to his home is barred by a closed iron gate and is further discouraged
by a "Private Property Keep Out" sign.
"If
it takes time, it takes time," Westbay said of the case. "I
didn't do it, so it doesn't bother me."
Edmonds'
family says it bothers them because suicide does not fit his personality
plus why did he spend all that money to lavish his kids with Easter presents,
talking about how excited he was to give them to the kids, if he was planning
a suicide?
Dodge
counters that Weakley-Jones' argument about the gun being so close to
Edmonds is: "The two men had been drinking. If dad was as drunk as
they say, then it's conceivable that Westbay could have had the element
of surprise on my dad."
Copyright
© 2007 by WJFA. All rights reserved. The material on this web site
may not be copied, published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
See WJFA's Disclaimer and Privacy
Policy. Contact the webmaster
to report issues. |